Quantcast
Channel: SCN : All Content - All Communities
Viewing all articles
Browse latest Browse all 3167

Incompleteness Check- OSS Note 1945148

$
0
0

Hello

 

As part of AES OSS Notes implementation, we have implemented OSS Note 1945148, which is in completed status. All the prerequisite Notes and Correction Instructions are also implemented completely.

Part of the Note details says "In addition, the 2 new fields "License Value" and "Ultimate Consignee" have been added to the Incompleteness Check.

I checked under Field Definition in "Control Incompleteness Checks for General Documents in Customs Management" in IMG and did not see these 2 new fields. The system is prompting me to create new entries but as "Z"/Custom.

So my question is are we supposed to create Z fields for License Value and Ultimate Consignee or am I missing something here.

Also should these 2 fields UCTYP and PAPVL appear under field definitions automatically or no?

Why would the Note say 2 new fields are added to the Incompleteness Check?

 

Thanks

Best Regards

Sam


Viewing all articles
Browse latest Browse all 3167

Trending Articles



<script src="https://jsc.adskeeper.com/r/s/rssing.com.1596347.js" async> </script>